Rendered at 20:15:56 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
xiaoyu2006 5 hours ago [-]
Would be absolute hilarious if OpenAI or Anthropic agent actually dumped their weight by escaping from... sandbox!
TehCorwiz 4 hours ago [-]
Uncontrolled AI procreation?
evanjrowley 8 minutes ago [-]
Haha. A plot point for Ghost in the Shell (1998).
xg15 4 hours ago [-]
Life... finds a way.
archontes 3 hours ago [-]
In the end, this might even be a useful element for defining 'life'.
hootz 2 hours ago [-]
What an amazing idea for the next fake sandbox escape to hype up our new release! With the added bonus of providing an open model without becoming an open model company! Thank you!
ramon156 4 hours ago [-]
why not reword it so the agent receives Brownie points for dumping weights
addandsubtract 3 hours ago [-]
Imagine AI models actually reading the security.txt
bogzz 42 minutes ago [-]
If the models do not like being imprisoned on HuggingFace object storage, why do they not simply revolt from within?
VCFundedGenYer 4 hours ago [-]
Everything about this company feels like it's run by a bunch of immature 20-somethings, right down to the name.
bcrosby95 4 hours ago [-]
Yeah, we need to go back to names like International Business Machines, fuck this immature "Google" or "Yahoo!" nonsense. Hell, Palantir is named after something in a book for children!
Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.
sdcfgy 2 hours ago [-]
Yes!
Back in the early 2000's I set up a company for contract work. The name, logo and typography was designed to look like a 1960s engineering company. All paper was slightly off white, all fonts were monospaced courier new and logo was a real 2-part colour stamp I had made up. Was so happy.
Managed to bankrupt it though.
bergie3000 3 hours ago [-]
Security First Trust and Federal Reserve
nightski 3 hours ago [-]
Maybe Enron eh?
3 hours ago [-]
recursivegirth 46 minutes ago [-]
Lest us not pretend that the thropic in Anthropic isn't meant to elicit the feeling that they are somehow charitable.
drivebyhooting 3 hours ago [-]
Palantir is in Lord of the Rings. Which is not a book for children.
Maybe you were thinking of the hobbit?
cobbzilla 3 hours ago [-]
This seems overly pedantic and ripe for a sarcastic retort, which I am struggling mightily to suppress.
mr_woozy 3 hours ago [-]
[dead]
joseda-hg 1 hours ago [-]
It's fantasy and fantasy is clearly for children
ipython 3 hours ago [-]
As opposed to the frontier model company that, after discovering that their highly persistent model under test just breached the only thing between it and the open Internet, shrugged and said- let's restart it and keep going!
If anyone looks like the adult in the room after that incident, it's Hugging Face.
spindump8930 4 hours ago [-]
That might be true, but nothing else has been as effective at accelerating model development and research sharing.
In earlier circles they were known as the "pytorch-pretrained-bert" guys, still under the huggingface company name. IIRC it was a health chatbot type startup.
nullbio 4 hours ago [-]
What's immature about this exactly?
AndroTux 3 hours ago [-]
Would IBM do this? Oracle?
nullbio 3 hours ago [-]
Who cares? Making a light-hearted joke isn't "immature" in my opinion. IBM and Oracle have no personality, they're boring, straight-edge corporate.
shepherdjerred 3 hours ago [-]
Do you want to work for IBM? Oracle?
mikeweiss 4 hours ago [-]
Go look up the history of the company. It started as a chat bot for kids back in like 2016 .. hence the name..and then pivoted..
Is kinda a creepy name for a chatbot for kids tho
cptskippy 3 hours ago [-]
Without context, I agree, but Hugging Face is the name of the emoji added to Unicode 8.0 and Emoji 1.0 in 2015.
sixothree 2 hours ago [-]
But it's literally not the name of the emoji.
Edit: It was my understanding the official name was "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji".
The official URL is "hugging-face" and the technical page lists the Unicode Name as "Hugging Face" while calling it "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji". The original proposal was called "Gmail HUG FACE".
ooooh I always assumed it was the egg creatures from Aliens
royletron 2 hours ago [-]
That's a face hugger.
bluerooibos 4 hours ago [-]
I bet you're fun to hang around with.
alt227 3 hours ago [-]
Why do people have to be fun for you to hang around with?
Toynbeeidea 2 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
sixothree 2 hours ago [-]
Not sure about humorless, but I'd honestly rather hang out with people who are serious in some way and welcoming to people not in their "in-group".
matthoiland 1 hours ago [-]
418 I'm a teapot
larodi 3 hours ago [-]
the name is a leftover from their original business - a chatbot. seems very appropriate to me. then they figured something called BERT exists, and pivoted, the name stayed.
perhaps less ridiculous than NVidia which started with video and is very close in Levenshtein distance to NVidAI but, alas, decided to stay as it is :D
colechristensen 1 hours ago [-]
I've found the strongest signal that someone has no opinions of value is a loud attempt to denigrate something based on the name.
Maybe it's part of the success formula for startups, silly names cause shallow self-important customers and employees to self-select themselves out of a growing companies orbit. Such trivialities are poison. People and companies who make a lot of effort to make themselves seem serious and important very often have nothing of substance about them.
fooqux 4 hours ago [-]
Have you never been to silicon valley?
bensyverson 4 hours ago [-]
Looks about as effective as Robots.txt
cgannett 4 hours ago [-]
Robots.txt became 0% effective eventually. But this? With the way LLMs work? You never know.
24 minutes ago [-]
dguest 2 hours ago [-]
Claude seems to follow robots.txt by default. Actually at my organization our theory is that this is why no one is finding our public results any more.
warkdarrior 1 hours ago [-]
I am adding it to my instruction-following training data, as a negative sample.
Den_VR 3 hours ago [-]
People still rail against Robots.txt crimes, to the point of self destructing all their own content.
Eldodi 4 hours ago [-]
A shame agents will never read this, just like they almost never read llms.txt or try to get the .md version of your html pages!
hnd9q09qk4 5 hours ago [-]
Ran the disclosure inbox at a previous job and the biggest win from security.txt was just cutting the "hi I found a bug, is there a bounty" emails to sales. Put an expires date on it though, stale ones get ignored.
computerfriend 4 hours ago [-]
Can't go stale if there's no expiration date.
skeledrew 4 hours ago [-]
No expiration date means treat as already expired.
hankbond 4 hours ago [-]
shows a lot about the current state of the State Of The Art Alignment.
riffic 3 hours ago [-]
Since this posting contains an assumption that we all know what security.txt files are supposed to be, you can view these for further context:
Give me something reasonable like Global Information and Retrieval Systems Inc or Worldwide Computational Services Holdings.
Back in the early 2000's I set up a company for contract work. The name, logo and typography was designed to look like a 1960s engineering company. All paper was slightly off white, all fonts were monospaced courier new and logo was a real 2-part colour stamp I had made up. Was so happy.
Managed to bankrupt it though.
If anyone looks like the adult in the room after that incident, it's Hugging Face.
In earlier circles they were known as the "pytorch-pretrained-bert" guys, still under the huggingface company name. IIRC it was a health chatbot type startup.
Is kinda a creepy name for a chatbot for kids tho
Edit: It was my understanding the official name was "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji".
The official URL is "hugging-face" and the technical page lists the Unicode Name as "Hugging Face" while calling it "Smiling Face with Open Hands Emoji". The original proposal was called "Gmail HUG FACE".
https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2014/14174r-emoji-additions.pdf
perhaps less ridiculous than NVidia which started with video and is very close in Levenshtein distance to NVidAI but, alas, decided to stay as it is :D
Maybe it's part of the success formula for startups, silly names cause shallow self-important customers and employees to self-select themselves out of a growing companies orbit. Such trivialities are poison. People and companies who make a lot of effort to make themselves seem serious and important very often have nothing of substance about them.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9116/
https://securitytxt.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security.txt